🔗 Share this article

Through a unsigned ruling, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to implement a revised congressional boundary scheme that could add several five new GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 decision, handed down on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to overturn a lower court's ruling that had invalidated the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating much confusion and disturbing the fine federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its ruling.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the new maps. It had instructed the state to use the districts established after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Stinging Opposition

With a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She stated that it undermined the work of the lower court, noting that its opinion was crafted by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan argued in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's new map, with all its increased favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The ruling comes amid a nationwide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, map-drawing occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that could add a number of more conservative seats. The opposition, for their part, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas top lawyer praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of his party. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

On the other hand, opposition party leaders decried the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

A top House figure argued the court had once again shredded its legitimacy by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.